Monday, June 15, 2026

Advancing a Health-Centered Approach to Substance Use and Substance Use Disorders: https://www.d4dpr.org/

Executive Summary

For decades, the United States has relied on arrest and incarceration to address drug use. These strategies have failed to achieve their intended aims and have coincided with an increase in harm and overdoses related to a contaminated, unregulated drug supply. Drug-related offenses remain the leading cause of arrest nationwide, with hundreds of thousands of people arrested each year for possession alone. These policies have not improved health outcomes and have instead contributed to an increase in preventable illness, death, and social instability.
This statement focuses on substance use involving illegal drugs and the associated health impacts of drug criminalization. Clinicians routinely observe that fear of arrest delays care, disrupts treatment, and worsens health outcomes for people who use drugs. Correctional settings are associated with worse health outcomes for people with drug use disorders than in community-based care. Limited access to effective treatments—particularly medications for opioid use disorder—contributes to elevated overdose risk during incarceration and following release. The consequences of drug criminalization extend beyond incarceration, as criminal records create lasting barriers to healthcare, housing, employment, and other essential supports.
Health outcomes related to drug use are not evenly distributed across the United States. Overdose, untreated substance use disorders, and preventable morbidity disproportionately affect Black, Latino, Indigenous, and low-income communities, despite similar rates of drug use across all populations. Differential enforcement of drug laws and resulting criminal justice involvement disrupt access to treatment and function as structural drivers of health inequities.
A public health-centered, evidence-based approach to drug use prioritizes access to care over punishment. Strategies such as overdose prevention services, naloxone distribution, and access to medications for opioid use disorder reduce overdose risk, save lives, and support engagement with care. Lawmakers should invest in health-centered approaches that reduce preventable harm, including health-based alternatives to arrest and the removal of criminal penalties for personal possession of drugs. Public policy should not contradict public health recommendations but work to bolster them.
Full Statement
We, the undersigned medical and public health organizations and individual health professionals and scientists, support an evidence-based, public health-centered approach to substance use that prioritizes health, safety, and access to care. In this statement, references to substance use and substance use disorders pertain to illegal drugs and do not include alcohol or tobacco. A health-centered approach ensures people who use drugs have ready access to treatment, overdose prevention services, primary health care, and supportive services like housing and job training. A public health approach to drug use includes ending criminal penalties for the personal possession of drugs and meaningfully investing in health services for people who use drugs (1). Decriminalization can decrease stigma associated with drug use, is associated with increased engagement with health services, and creates conditions that facilitate access to care (2).
For decades, the United States has attempted to address drug use through arrest and incarceration. Drug-related offenses are the leading cause of arrest in the United States, with more than 800,000 arrests made per year for possession alone (3). Despite over 50 years of arresting and incarcerating people for drugs, the drug supply has become more dangerous, overdose deaths have skyrocketed, and drug use rates have not decreased. Punitive drug policies have failed to improve public health outcomes and have instead heightened the risks associated with drug use (4).
As physicians, health practitioners, and public health and public policy experts, our foremost responsibility is to protect the health and well-being of our patients and communities – including people who use drugs. As clinicians, we routinely see how fear of arrest delays care, interrupts treatment, and worsens health outcomes (5, 6). Punishing people who use drugs (including those who use drugs during pregnancy) - rather than providing evidence-based care - contradicts the well-established medical consensus that substance use disorders are health conditions, not criminal problems (7, 8). Drug criminalization and aggressive enforcement also
discourage clinicians from prescribing evidence-based treatments, like methadone and buprenorphine, out of fear of surveillance, investigation, or even prosecution (9).
Correctional facilities are not healthcare settings, and their punitive environments often exacerbate existing medical and psychiatric conditions (10). Rates of fatal overdose in jails and prisons are alarmingly high, with deaths from drug or alcohol intoxication in state prisons increasing more than six-fold between 2001 and 2018 (11). Despite strong evidence that medications for opioid use disorder, like methadone and buprenorphine, reduce overdose risk, cravings, and withdrawal (12), these treatments remain largely unavailable in most carceral settings (13). People living with substance use disorders should receive timely, evidence-based
treatment from qualified health professionals in their community, not be subjected to a criminal legal system that exacerbates illness and increases the risk of death.
Drug criminalization delays access to care and disrupts the path to recovery (14). Too often, a drug arrest traps people in a cycle of arrest and release—without ever addressing the root causes, like lack of housing, employment, mental health support, or other basic needs. A criminal record can then block access to housing, education, jobs, treatment, and public benefits—all of which are essential for stability and healing (15). Thus, the harm of a drug arrest often lingers long after the sentence ends.
Marked disparities in drug-related health outcomes persist across the United States. Rates of overdose, untreated substance use disorder, and preventable morbidity are disproportionately high in Black, Latino, Indigenous, and low-income communities, despite similar rates of drug use across racial and ethnic groups (16, 17). These disparities are driven in part by the differential enforcement of drug laws. Higher rates of arrest and criminal justice involvement in these communities are associated with disrupted access to healthcare, reduced availability of treatment and overdose prevention services, and increased barriers to housing, employment, and public benefits—each a well-established determinant of health (6). Structural racism embedded in drug policy and enforcement thus functions as a population-level health risk. Reducing these inequities requires limiting criminal justice exposure and investing in accessible, community-based health services in the communities most affected.
Decades of research and frontline experience demonstrate the benefits of a health-focused approach to drug use (18). Strategies such as naloxone distribution and access to medications for opioid use disorder are effective because they meet people where they are and provide access points to needed services (19). Despite recent decreases in overdose death rates, overdose deaths remain unacceptably high.
Lawmakers should prioritize investment in health-centered approaches that improve access to care and reduce preventable harm, including health-based alternatives to arrest and the removal of criminal penalties for personal possession of drugs.
References
1. The Lancet (2023). Drug decriminalisation: grounding policy in evidence. Lancet (London, England), 402(10416), 1941. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02617-X
2. Volkow N. D. (2021). Addiction should be treated, not penalized.
Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 46(12), 2048–2050.
3. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2023). Crime Data Explorer. CJIS.
4. O'Dowd A. (2024). Drug policy: Time to change punitive approach, says global report. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 387, q2753. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2753
5. Ostrach, B., Hixon, V., & Bryce, A. (2024). "When people who use drugs can't differentiate between medical care and cops, it's a problem." Compounding risks of law Enforcement Harassment & Punitive Healthcare Policies. Health & justice, 12(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-023-00256-3
6. Cohen, A., Vakharia, S. P., Netherland, J., & Frederique, K. (2022). How the war on drugs impacts social determinants of health beyond the criminal legal system. Annals of Medicine, 54(1), 2024–2038. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2100926
7. Shah, S. K., Perez-Cardona, L., Helner, K., Massey, S. H., Premkumar, A., Edwards, R., Norton, E. S., Rogers, C. E., Miller, E. S., Smyser, C. D., Davis, M. M., & Wakschlag, L. S. (2023). How penalizing substance use in pregnancy affects treatment and research: a qualitative examination of researchers' perspectives. Journal of law and the biosciences, 10(2), lsad019. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsad019
8. Volkow, N. D., Poznyak, V., Saxena, S., Gerra, G., & UNODC-WHO Informal International Scientific Network (2017). Drug use disorders: impact of a public health rather than a criminal justice approach. World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 16(2), 213–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20428
9. Madras, B. K., Ahmad, N. J., Wen, J., & Sharfstein, J. S. (2020). Improving Access to Evidence-Based Medical Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: Strategies to Address Key Barriers within the Treatment System. NAM perspectives, 2020, 10.31478/202004b. https://doi.org/10.31478/202004b
10. Committee on Causes and Consequences of High Rates of Incarceration, Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council, Board on the Health of Select Populations, & Institute of Medicine. (2013). Impact of Incarceration on Health. In National Academies Press (US), Health and Incarceration: A Workshop Summary. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK201966/
11. Carson, E. A. (2021). Mortality in State and Federal Prisons, 2001-2018 – Statistical Tables. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/msfp0118st.pdf
12. NIDA. (2025). Medications for Opioid Use Disorder. NIH.
13. NORC at the University of Chicago. (2023). JCOIN’s National Survey of Substance Use Services in Jails: Describing U.S. Jails and Their Screening, Treatment, Recovery, and Re-entry Practices. JCOIN. https://jcoinctc.org/MAT-results-from-JCOIN-national.../
14. Drug Policy Alliance. (2025). From Crisis to Care. Drug Policy Alliance.
15. Jones, A., & Sawyer, W. (2019). Arrest, Release, Repeat: How police and jails are misused to respond to social problems. Prison Policy Initiative.
16. Kariisa, M., Davis, N. L., Kumar, S., Seth, P., Mattson, C. L., Chowdhury, F., & Jones, C. M. (2022). Vital Signs: Drug Overdose Deaths, by Selected Sociodemographic and Social Determinants of Health Characteristics - 25 States and the District of Columbia, 2019-2020. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 71(29), 940–947. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7129e2
17. National Survey on Drug Use and Health. (2023). Behavioral Health by Race and Ethnicity: Results from the 2021-2023 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. SAMHSA. https://www.samhsa.gov/.../2023-nsduh-race-eth-companion.pdf
18. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US); Office of the Surgeon General (US). (2016). Vision for the Future: A Public Health Approach. In US Department of Health and Human Services, Facing Addiction in America: The Surgeon General's Report on Alcohol, Drugs, and Health.
19. Salisbury-Afshar, E., Gale, B., & Mossburg, S. (2024). Harm Reduction Strategies to Improve Safety for People Who Use Substances. PSNet. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/.../harm-reduction-strategies...

Wednesday, June 3, 2026

ANA: Cannabis Nursing Competencies

 2026 Annual Meeting of the ANA Membership Assembly

Dialogue Forum Topic

Friday, June 26, 2026

Integrating Cannabis Nursing Competencies Through Education and Policy to Advance Patient Safety and Compassionate Care in Practice

BACKGROUND DOCUMENT

Submitted by: Deanna Collins Sommers, PhD, MSN, RN, Janice Putnam, PhD, RN, and Llewellyn Dawn Smith, MSN, RN, CNEcl

Overview:

This proposal addresses the critical intersection of nursing education, clinical practice, and health policy in response to the increasing use of cannabis for therapeutic purposes across the United States (Congressional Research Service [CRS], 2023). Cannabis is widely utilized by patients for symptom management in a variety of acute and chronic conditions, including pain, cancer-related symptoms, neurological disorders, and palliative care needs (Bryan, 2025; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2025; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine [NASEM], 2017). Despite this growth, corresponding advancements in nursing education, institutional policies, and regulatory frameworks have not progressed proportionately.

In 1996, California became the first state to permit the medical use of cannabis. As of March 1, 2026, 40 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands have enacted comprehensive medical cannabis laws. An additional eight states allow limited-access cannabis use, typically restricted to low-THC or cannabidiol (CBD) products. Many states have also enacted adult-use cannabis policies, further contributing to a complex and evolving regulatory environment for health care providers and patients (CRS, 2023). While the legal landscape continues to evolve rapidly, a small number of jurisdictions still prohibit medical cannabis use entirely (CRS, 2023).

As a result, nurses are frequently placed in complex clinical situations without the foundational knowledge, institutional support, or policy guidance necessary to provide safe, ethical, and evidence-informed care. These gaps have significant implications for patient safety, nursing practice, and health care equity.

Grounded in the Code of Ethics for Nurses (American Nurses Association [ANA], 2025), this proposal affirms nursing’s ethical obligations to practice with compassion; prioritize patient-centered care; and advocate for the health, safety, and rights of individuals and communities. Nursing also has a responsibility to advance knowledge, inform policy, and address health inequities through leadership and advocacy (ANA, 2025). Integrating cannabis nursing competencies with compassionate care policies represents a unified approach to addressing current gaps in practice (Parmelee, 2025; Parmelee, 2022).

Background:

Cannabis and cannabinoid-based therapies are widely utilized by patients for symptom management; however, nursing education has not kept pace with this evolving area of clinical practice. Evidence supports the therapeutic benefits of medical cannabis for conditions such as chronic pain, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, and multiple sclerosis-related spasticity (NASEM, 2017; Parmelee et al., 2021; Russo, 2016). Persistent gaps in knowledge related to dosing, pharmacology, drug interactions, and longterm outcomes underscore the need for evidence-informed clinical guidance.

Despite increasing patient use, most nursing curricula lack foundational education on the endocannabinoid system, cannabis pharmacology, and clinical considerations for therapeutic use (King, 2024; Parmelee, 2022; NCSBN, 2018). This lack of standardized education leaves nurses underprepared to assess, educate, and safely care for patients who use cannabis for treatment.

These gaps are particularly evident in long-term care, hospice, oncology, and communitybased settings. Licensed practical/vocational nurses (LPNs/LVNs), who provide a substantial portion of direct patient care in these settings, may be disproportionately impacted due to more limited access to advanced education and continuing professional development opportunities (Kurtzman et al., 2022). This disparity has important diversity, equity, and inclusion implications, as LPNs/LVNs often represent more diverse segments of the nursing workforce and serve populations experiencing structural inequities.

This educational gap contributes to uncertainty in clinical decision-making, as nurses navigate conflicting legal, ethical, and institutional expectations without clear guidance. Federal classification of cannabis as a Schedule I controlled substance, defined as having no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse, continues to conflict with statelevel legalization, resulting in regulatory ambiguity that puts nurses at risk for professional, legal, and ethical consequences (Perlman et al., 2021). Recent federal actions to expand research and reconsider scheduling further underscore the evolving regulatory landscape and the need for clarity to support safe nursing practice (Trump, 2025).

The Code of Ethics for Nurses provides a clear framework for addressing these challenges. Nurses are obligated to practice with compassion (Provision 1), maintain commitment to the patient (Provision 2), and advocate for patient safety and rights (Provision 3) (ANA, 2025). These responsibilities are difficult to fulfill when nurses lack the education and institutional support needed to address cannabis use safely.

Patient autonomy is central to nursing practice. Patients have the right to make informed decisions regarding their care, including the use of cannabis for therapeutic purposes. Nurses are ethically obligated to provide accurate, evidence-based information; however, without adequate education and policy guidance, they cannot fully support informed decision-making (ANA, 2025; NCSBN, 2018).

The absence of standardized institutional policies further complicates practice. Compassionate care legislation, such as California’s Ryan’s Law, allows terminally ill patients to use medical cannabis within health care facilities under defined conditions, demonstrating that structured, patient-centered approaches are feasible (Americans for Safe Access, 2025; McKaig et al., 2025). However, these models are not widely implemented or standardized. In the absence of such models, nurses must navigate competing obligations between patient advocacy and organizational or legal constraints. This disconnect contributes to moral distress among nurses by limiting their ability to fully meet ethical obligations to relieve suffering and provide compassionate care. Moral distress is associated with burnout, job dissatisfaction, and workforce instability (Brennan et al., 2019).

At a systems level, the lack of alignment between education, policy, and practice undermines patient safety and contributes to inequities in care delivery. Nurses must be equipped with the competencies, knowledge, and institutional support necessary to provide safe, ethical, and equitable care (ANA & ACNA, 2024). Consistent with ANA’s commitment to evidence-based practice and stigma reduction, there is a critical need for a unified approach that integrates education, clinical standards, and policy development (ANA & ACNA, 2024; ANA, 2022; NCSBN, 2018).

Proposed Recommendations:

1.      Support Development of Model Clinical Guidance

Support development of clinical and ethical guidance for cannabis use in patient care.

• Urge ANA to conduct a free webinar promoting equitable access and highlighting best practices, stigma, laws, and resources.


2.      Promote Policy Alignment and Practice Support

Advance efforts that support clarity and alignment across regulatory environments.                

• Support federal and state policies that reduce legal, regulatory, practice, and licensure risk for integrating cannabis related to nursing (ANA, 2022; NCSBN, 2018).

Conclusion:

The integration of cannabis nursing education, compassionate care policies, and regulatory alignment is essential to advancing safe, ethical, and patient-centered care. This proposal reflects the ethical foundation of nursing practice and positions nurses as leaders in addressing emerging clinical and policy challenges.

Aligning education, practice, and policy ensures that patients receive equitable, evidenceinformed care while supporting nurses in fulfilling their professional responsibilities.

Furthermore, advancing equity across the nursing workforce remains essential. Ensuring access to consistent, evidence-informed education across licensure levels and practice settings is critical to reducing disparities in care and supporting safe, culturally responsive practice (Kurtzman et al., 2022).

References:

American Nurses Association. (2025). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Association.

American Nurses Association. (2022). Therapeutic use of marijuana and related cannabinoids. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol27No01PoSCol01

American Nurses Association & American Cannabis Nurses Association. (2024). Cannabis nursing: Scope and standards of practice. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Association.

Americans for Safe Access. (2025). CA healthcare facility implementation guide for the Compassionate Access to Medical Cannabis Act (“Ryan’s Law”). https://www.safeaccessnow.org/ryanslaw_facilityresources#gsc.tab=0

Armentano, P. (2021, September 13). California lawmakers advance legislation permitting medical cannabis use in hospitals. NORML. https://norml.org

Banerjee, S., & McCormack, S. (2019). Medical cannabis for the treatment of chronic pain: A review of clinical effectiveness and guidelines. CADTH. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546424/

Bodine, M., & Kemp, A. K. (2023). Medical cannabis use in oncology. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK572067/

Borgelt, L. M., & Franson, K. L. (2017). Considerations for hospital policies regarding cannabis use. Hospital Pharmacy, 52(2), 89–90. https://doi.org/10.1310/hpj5202-89

Brennan, F., Lohman, D., & Gwyther, L. (2019). Access to pain management as a human right. American Journal of Public Health, 109(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304743

Bryan, K. (2025). Cannabis overview. National Conference of State Legislatures. https://www.ncsl.org

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025, March 7). Cannabis and public health. https://www.cdc.gov/cannabis/about/what-cdc-is-doing.html

Clark, C. S. (2021). Cannabis: A handbook for nurses. Wolters Kluwer.

Congressional Research Service. (2023). Medical marijuana: State and federal policy overview (IF12270). https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12270

King, D. D. (2024). The role of stigma in cannabis use disclosure: an exploratory study. Harm Reduction Journal, 21(21), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-00929-8

Kleckner, A. S., Kleckner, I. R., Kamen, C. S., Tejani, M. A., Janelsins, M. C., Morrow, G. R., & Peppone, L. J. (2019). Opportunities for cannabis in supportive care in cancer. Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, 11, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835919866362

Kurtzman, E. T., Greene, J., Begley, R., & Drenkard, K. N. (2022). “We want what’s best for patients”: Nurse leaders’ attitudes about medical cannabis. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 4, 100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100065

Lawler, Z. (2025). Medical cannabis & cannabinoid regulation. Chambers Practice Guides.

McKaig, A., Ridad, A., Bell, A., McParlane, R., & Quirch, M. (2025). Implementing Ryan’s Law on an inpatient oncology unit. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 29(1), 86– 90. https://doi.org/10.1188/25.CJON.86-90

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). The health effects of cannabis and cannabinoids: The current state of evidence and recommendations for research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24625

National Council of State Boards of Nursing. (2018). The NCSBN national nursing guidelines for medical marijuana. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 9(2), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(18)30094-2

Parmelee, R. (2025). Nurse educators’ experiences with medical cannabis education. Walden University, College of Nursing. Walden University. Retrieved December 15, 2025.

Parmelee, R. A. (2022). Nursing students’ knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding medicinal cannabis care. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 13(3), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(22)00082-5

Parmelee, R. C., Clark, C., & Sommers, D. C. (2021). Cannabis pharmacology: From the whole plant to pharmaceutical applications. In C. Clark, Cannabis: A handbook for nurses (pp. 115–160). Wolters Kluwer.

Russo, E. B. (2016). Cannabis and Cannabinoids: Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Therapeutic Potential. Routledge.

Perlman, A. I., McLeod, H. M., Ventresca, E. C., Post, P. J., Schuh, M. J., & Dabrah, M. A. (2021). Medical cannabis state and federal regulations: Implications for U.S. healthcare entities. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 96(10), 2671–2681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.05.005 7

Ryan, J. E., McCabe, S. E., & Boyd, C. J. (2021). Medicinal cannabis: Policy, patients, and providers. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 22(2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527154421989609

Spector, C. B. (2018). Medical marijuana: A national survey of nursing education and practice. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 9(2), 36–43.

Trump, D. (2025, December 18). Increasing medical marijuana and cannabidiol research (Executive Order 14370). The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov

Wilbert, E., & Adinoff, B. (2023). Legislative and administrative guidelines for regulating cannabis use in healthcare facilities. Doctors for Cannabis Regulation

 

Ken's summary of DEA's move of medicinal cannabis to Schedule III:

The Justice Department and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) announced on 4/23/26 the issuance of an order (published 4/28) immediately placing marijuana products regulated by a state medical marijuana license in Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), as well as a new administrative hearing beginning June 29, 2026 to consider the broader rescheduling of marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III. www.justice.gov 4.23.26.6754-2026 PDF

“The new federal scheduling action recognizes qualifying medical cannabis as medicine…The order moves certain medical cannabis products from Schedule I to Schedule III. This includes Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved marijuana products and marijuana products covered by qualifying state medical cannabis licenses.”

“The order also recognizes that state medical cannabis programs are part of the medical access landscape. State systems already regulate patient access, licensing, dispensing, labeling, packaging, security, disposal, and recordkeeping. The order relies on this existing state infrastructure to promote medical benefits and avoid unnecessary disruption to patients and state systems. The order recognizes medical cannabis patient registration as equivalent to a prescription.

“State-authorized medical marijuana certifications or similar documents are sufficient to permit the dispensing of medical marijuana to users, provided they include the user's name and address, are dated and signed on the day of issuance, and identify the issuing practitioner.”

“Under 21 U.S.C. 811(d)(l), if control of a substance is required ‘by United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on October 27, 1970’-which includes the Single Convention-the Attorney General shall issue an order controlling such drug under the schedule he deems most appropriate to carry out such obligations.

4.23.26.6754-2026 PDF (www.justice.gov)

Ken’s rescheduling suggestions:

In response to the federal government’s recognition of marijuana as a Schedule III medicine when it comes from state medicinal cannabis programs, several steps should be pursued immediately.

·        All RN/LPN nursing schools should include the Endocannabinoid System (ECS) in their Anatomy and Physiology or Health Services curricula. “The discovery of the Endocannabinoid System (ECS) about 30 years ago provides the scientific basis for how cannabis can help with so many diseases, symptoms, and medical conditions. The ECS consists partly of a series of receptors throughout the entire human body for the components of marijuana--the cannabinoids. Our own body produces substances--endocannabinoids--that are identical to phytocannabinoids, or the cannabinoids found in the cannabis plant. The purpose of the ECS is to restore homeostasis, or balance, to the mind and body. Medical cannabis can help where there is a deficiency in the production of the natural endocannabinoids. ECS researchers say that this system may play a role in all disease processes.” https://cmmnj.blogspot.com/2024/06/testimony-to-nj-cannabis-regulatory.html

·        Medicinal cannabis must be integrated into the entire American healthcare system. Medication policies must be updated, and medicinal cannabis must be added to the facility’s Controlled Substances Policy. “Currently, most health care facilities forbid the use of medical cannabis in the facility. This is a dangerous and potentially fatal situation. A patient who suffers from seizures may be admitted to a health care facility for a condition that is unrelated to the seizure condition. Then, when the patient is denied access to the only medicine that controls their seizures--medical cannabis--the result can be fatal.” https://cmmnj.blogspot.com/2024/06/testimony-to-nj-cannabis-regulatory.html

·        Medicinal cannabis must be available in all government institutions that have patients with qualifying conditions for medicinal cannabis in the state. As I told the NJ CRC in June 2024: “It is my sincere hope that the state will recognize its responsibility to the institutionalized patients in New Jersey. For 25 years, I have worked as a registered nurse (RN) in state institutions. I know that many patients in these institutions qualify for medical cannabis and could benefit greatly from it. The staff in these institutions are trained to administer, account for, and evaluate the effect of controlled substances. There is no reason to withhold this important medical therapy from these patients. In fact, courts have determined that inmates in New Jersey’s prison system are entitled to “community standards” of healthcare. Edible and topical medical cannabis products will improve health care in state institutions, group homes, hospices, etc., and will reduce the costs of running these programs.” https://cmmnj.blogspot.com/2024/06/testimony-to-nj-cannabis-regulatory.html

·        Continuing education (CEUs) on the ECS should be mandatory as a condition for continued licensure for nurses. This will help to overcome the paucity of educational programs in nursing schools. It will also serve as a model for other healthcare professions.

·        Support legislation that provides insurance coverage for medicinal cannabis in the state’s program. N.J. bill (S3984/A1023) Requires workers' compensation, PIP, and health insurance coverage for the medical use of cannabis under certain circumstances.

·        Dosing and administration standards should be adopted by the ANA. I recommended that the NJ Cannabis Regulatory Commission (CRC) “should quickly adopt cannabis Dosing and Administration guidelines and educational programs on the Endocannabinoid System. The CRC must promulgate these guidelines and programs to the cannabis consuming community and to the healthcare community to increase the safety and appropriate use of cannabis products. In fact, the Jake Honig Act required these guidelines, but they have yet to be adopted in New Jersey:

     “g.    The commission shall establish, by regulation, curricula for health care practitioners…:

     (1)   The curriculum for health care practitioners shall be designed to assist practitioners in counseling patients with regard to the quantity, dosing, and administration of medical cannabis as shall be appropriate to treat the patient’s qualifying medical condition.  Health care practitioners shall complete the curriculum as a condition of authorizing patients for the medical use of cannabis.”

Educational programs on the Endocannabinoid System for medical providers in New Jersey, now including physicians, Advanced Practice Nurses, and Physician Assistants, are required. Dosing and Administration guidelines and ECS educational programs are readily available. Some of the best resources on the ECS include:

·         Patients Out of Time: https://patientsoutoftime.com/

·         Americans for Safe Access: http://www.safeaccessnow.org/

·         Society of Cannabis Clinicians: http://cannabisclinicians.org/

·         American Cannabis Nurses Association: https://www.cannabisnurses.org/

·         Project CBD https://www.projectcbd.org/

·         The Answer Page: https://www.theanswerpage.com/

·         National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws: https://norml.org/

The New Jersey Department of Health’s Executive Order 6 Report on 3/23/2018:

The Department recognizes the need to provide education and guidance to providers. To that end, the Department is exploring the creation of an education program for all physicians, with focus on the endocannabinoid system. The Department plans to leverage the expertise of the Medicinal Marijuana Review Panel to oversee the curriculum development for this program. This education program will serve to create best practices for the safe and effective administration of medicinal marijuana to the expanded universe of qualifying patients. In conjunction with the provider education program, there is also a need to develop standardized dosing and administrative protocols for medicinal marijuana products, including information on expected effects, side effects, and adverse effects. 2018.03.23 EO6Report_Final.pdf

Americans for Safe Access comments:

For medical cannabis patients, this is federal recognition of the medical value of cannabis. It gives patients in states with medical cannabis programs a new legal platform for federal rights, protected access, and integration of medical cannabis into U.S. healthcare systems.

For state-authorized patients, this means advocates now have a stronger basis to assert:

  • rights and protections under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Fair Housing Act, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act;
  • protections against being denied housing, employment, healthcare, or reasonable accommodation solely because of patient status;
  • protections against being treated as criminals for possessing state-authorized medical cannabis;
  • protections for parents and caregivers whose medical cannabis status has been used against them;
  • protections for patients in federally subsidized housing, healthcare settings, federal workplaces, veterans’ care, and other federal systems.

·         This does not mean every policy has already been updated. It means the legal premise has changed. Federal agencies now need to bring their policies into alignment with the recognition that qualifying medical cannabis is legitimate medicine. https://www.safeaccessnow.org/is_cannabis_legal_now#gsc.tab=0


NORML Op-Ed: Reclassifying Medical Marijuana Was Long Overdue, but It’s Still Not Enough:

“Specifically, this new order does not aid patients residing in the 10 US states that do not yet regulate medical cannabis use. They will continue to have to fend for themselves. And they will continue to risk arrest and prosecution for doing so.”

“Further, this federal policy change provides no legal remedies for either the thousands of businesses or the millions of consumers who reside in the 24 states that have legalized recreational marijuana for adults. Even with this change, adults who sell or consume cannabis in accordance with their state laws are still technically breaking federal law.”

“To rectify this state/federal conflict — and to provide state governments with the explicit authority to establish their own adult-use cannabis regulatory policies, like they already do with alcohol — cannabis must be removed from the Controlled Substances Act altogether.”

https://norml.org/blog/2026/05/12/norml-op-ed-reclassifying-medical-marijuana-was-long-overdue-but-its-still-not-enough/

 

Opponents filed a lawsuit:

 

It should be noted that marijuana opponents filed a lawsuit To Block Trump Administration’s Federal Rescheduling Move. SAM and the National Drug and Alcohol Screening Association (NDASA) on 5/4/26 asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for DC Circuit to set aside the cannabis rescheduling action, alleging that they have been “aggrieved” by the reform. (Though it seems hard to believe that the courts would agree that opponents of marijuana would be more harmed by rescheduling than the millions of medical cannabis patients would be by rescinding the rescheduling.)

 

Ken Wolski, RN, MPA

Executive Director, Coalition for Medical Marijuana--New Jersey, Inc.

219 Woodside Ave., Trenton, NJ 08618
609.394.2137 (home/office)

609.721.1658 (cell/text)

ohamkrw@aol.com

5/28/26